<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>technology &#38; the social &#187; collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ericka.cc/tag/collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ericka.cc</link>
	<description>Occasional thoughts about research &#38; life as a Ph.D. candidate, by Ericka Menchen-Trevino</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:47:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Connective Efficacy</title>
		<link>http://www.ericka.cc/2006/01/connective-efficacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ericka.cc/2006/01/connective-efficacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 03:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ericka</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.erickamenchen.net/2006/01/03/connective-efficacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been talking, reading, and thinking about why people contribute to collective efforts &#8211; specifically online databases but in general as well. I consistently come across various versions of what I&#8217;ve seen most aptly termed as connective efficacy. That&#8217;s the name of a relatively obscure variable that is &#8220;an expectation that information contributed to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been talking, reading, and thinking about why people contribute to collective efforts &#8211; specifically online databases but in general as well. I consistently come across various versions of what I&#8217;ve seen most aptly termed as connective efficacy. That&#8217;s the name of a relatively obscure variable that is &#8220;an expectation that information contributed to the database [or whatever] will reach other members of the collective&#8221; (Kalman et al, 2002, p. 125). I think it&#8217;s a great succinct term to communicate that idea &#8211; which is a really important part of why people contribute to collective projects from open source software to public park fundraisers. Naming something can give it a relevance and power it hasn&#8217;t had before. Maybe if I hear the term around more often I&#8217;ll have a higher connective efficacy perception for this blog <img src='http://www.ericka.cc/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Kalman, M. E., Monge, P., Fulk, J., &#038; Henino, R. (2002). Motivations to Resolve Communication Dilemmas in Database-Mediated Collaboration. Communication Research, 29(2), 125-154.</p>
<p>This is another good reference on the topic:<a href="http://www.uib.es/depart/deeweb/seminaris/pdfs/KnowSharingDilemmas.pdf"> http://www.uib.es/depart/deeweb/seminaris/pdfs/KnowSharingDilemmas.pdf</a></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE 1/8/06</strong>: This post is the number one google result right now for connective efficacy &#8211; not in quotes. That&#8217;s somewhat astounding to me given the traffic I get here. I think it says more about the uncommonness of the term than the google juice of this site. Probably recency plays a role in the rankings &#8211; I&#8217;ll check back later to see if I&#8217;ve been usurped. <strong>2/15/06</strong>: Still #1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ericka.cc/2006/01/connective-efficacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
